In 2019, Formula One called on the team at |drive| to augment the F1 brand and refine the opening title with a more “race day” approach to our original concept. Our team recognized that the most emotive way to inject team-like color into the driver sequen…
Source: Formula One 2019 on Behance
Love seeing the iterations of the graphic style of the new F1 intro. Bringing up the identity of the drivers has been a big thing Liberty, the new owners of Formula 1, have been emphasizing.
My grandfather was a mechanic who worked on ship engines in the Navy, cars, and later airplane engines. In his time, a steering wheel was turning a rack and pinion by the force of the driver and the engine timing was controlled mechanically. Fast forward today and look how much computers control every aspect of a car. The engine timing is controlled electronically, the inertia created by the brakes send power to a hybrid’s battery, and drivers are assisted by lane guidance and GPS. A old Jaguar from the 1960s he worked on is a far cry to today’s modern Tesla.
Any new functionality brings complexity. With that complexity, we become further removed from the original bones of that technology. A car from the 1960s and today share many common bones: four wheels, a seat for the driver, a steering wheel, and pedals. However, it is clear that there is an evolution between then and now. Add computerization and the driver is further removed from the actual mechanical movements making the car operate.
This takes us to today with modern frameworks like React and JSX to do the work of writing HTML and CSS for us. Node JS-based tools like Gulp, Babel, and Webpack do the heavy lifting of managing dependencies and transpiling code into other code.
There are so many more things we can do in a web browser today, more so than Tim Berners-Lee could have imagined, but it is important for any craftsman/person to deeply understand their craft. Remember what the bones the web are when you are working in a dozen layers of abstraction away from the HTML.
Web Components look really interesting, but I don’t think I will drop everything to start implementing it quite yet. There is something really satisfying about a self-contained chunk of code that can be reused into project.
In December 2018, Microsoft announced that Edge would adopt Chromium, the open source project that powers Google Chrome. Many within the industry reacted
Source: Edge Goes Chromium: What Does it Mean for Front-End Developers? | CSS-Tricks
Where it gets interesting is when a technology that’s designed for developer convenience is made out of the very materials being delivered to users. For example, a CSS framework like Bootstrap is made of CSS. That’s different to a tool like Sass which outputs CSS. Whether or not a developer chooses to use Sass is irrelevant to the user—the final output will be CSS either way. But if a developer chooses to use a CSS framework, that decision has a direct impact on the user experience. The user must download the framework in order for the developer to get the benefit.
Source: Adactio: Journal—Split
This is exactly the kind of thing I have been thinking about with the growth of today’s web development workflow. Jeremy Keith has such a great way of hitting the nail on the head when raising big issues in the web development world.